Trying Juveniles as Adults

Whether one is fifteen or fifty years old and he/she has committed a crime, this is not only astonishing to think about but also difficult to imagine. In Greg Krikorian's article, "Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult Trial..", Krikorian describes how many juveniles who are tried as adults may be unable to stand trial because they are unable "emotionally and intellectually" to contribute to their own defense. I am both ways on the entire situation of charging juveniles as adults. Yes, if a minor committed a severe crime, such as murdering an elder, they should face a much more serious consequence than an individual who robs a store. I do not believe however, that such consequences can influence minor on the act committed. The Atlantic Month specifies how Whitman developed a tumor which caused the series of shots which included a receptionist, two families, and other pedestrians. He damaged his amygdala, initially causing both "emotional and social disturbance". This being said, I don't believe the jury should take into consideration the crime and how "serious" it is based on the person. Factors such as genetics, medication (if applicable) and the environment one is in for most of their time should help the jury decide if minors should be tried as adults. Then again, how can anyone ever really know what to take into account in such a serious manner? Yes, we are given evidence from other individuals who witnessed the crime but we are missing the bigger picture.